SOC 2 Type 1 vs Type 2: Which Report Should You Pursue First?

Your software product has passed the technical evaluation, pricing discussions are complete, and an enterprise customer is ready to proceed. Then procurement requests your latest SOC 2 report. Nothing like that exists yet.

This situation creates an immediate challenge for Australian SaaS companies entering larger markets. Security assurance takes time, and rushing into the wrong assessment may not satisfy the customer’s requirements. The way forward begins with understanding what the buyer expects and planning backward from the deadline.

A calm first step is to find out exactly what was asked for, and by when. The request can leave more room than it first appears to, so ask before you assume.

Find Out Which SOC 2 Report the Customer Needs

SOC 2 reports don’t all provide the same level of assurance. When responding to enterprise security requirements, the distinction between SOC 2 type 1 vs type 2 matters. Type 1 evaluates whether relevant controls are suitably designed at a particular date. Type 2 examines their design and operating effectiveness over a defined period.

Many enterprise buyers specifically request Type 2 because it provides evidence covering actual operations, though some may accept Type 1 temporarily. Before commissioning an examination, confirm the report type, required scope, and acceptable reporting dates with the customer.

Keep a written record of the answers, because the report type, scope, and dates all drive the plan and the budget. If the customer’s requirements are unclear, ask for the exact wording in the contract or the security questionnaire.

Let the Observation Period Drive Your Timeline

A SOC 2 type 2 examination cannot be completed simply by preparing documentation and scheduling an auditor. Throughout the reporting period, the organization must operate its relevant controls. An initial examination may cover a period of three months, whereas subsequent reports commonly cover longer ones.

If your business needs to demonstrate access reviews, security training, or change approvals, those activities must occur and be documented during the applicable window. Planning backward from a customer deadline helps identify whether the requested report can realistically be delivered on time.

If the deadline is tighter than the observation period allows, tell the customer early. Interim steps, such as a dated plan, are something some customers will discuss if they hear about the gap early.

Know What You’re Actually Buying

SOC 2 does not issue certificates, even though businesses frequently search for SOC 2 type 2 certification.

A licensed CPA firm performs an independent examination against the applicable AICPA Trust Services Criteria and issues an attestation report. The assessed system, relevant controls, testing procedures, and the auditor’s opinion are all described in the report.

That document is what customers typically review, often under a confidentiality agreement. A specific historical period is also what a SOC type 2 report relates to. It doesn’t automatically give assurance about every change made afterward.

Costs to Know About Before You Begin

More than an independent examination fee is involved in SOC 2 preparation. Businesses may need assistance developing policies, conducting risk assessments, preparing evidence, training employees, and arranging security testing.

For businesses with up to 50 employees, Siege Cyber advertises a SOC 2 compliance package at AUD $2,750 per month, excluding GST, over twelve months. To be covered by the advertised offer, eligible contracts must be signed by December 31, 2026. The package includes compliance preparation, training, a compliance platform, and external penetration testing.

Billed separately is the independent CPA examination, with Siege Cyber indicating typical fees of approximately AUD 5,000–15,000, depending on scope and complexity. Before committing, confirm current pricing, eligibility, and deliverables.

Dealing With a Report That Has Aged

Imagine a customer requesting assurance in October when your Type 2 report covers January through June. The intervening months fall outside what the report examines. A management-issued bridge letter describing relevant changes since the reporting period ended may be acceptable to some customers.

A bridge letter does not replace an independent examination, and acceptance depends on the customer’s requirements. Raise reporting gaps early instead of assuming an older report will satisfy procurement.

Make Your Compliance Investment Work Beyond One Contract

Siege Cyber provides Australian-based SOC 2 readiness support with fixed-price consulting packages and independent audit coordination. The most useful approach for growing software companies is to connect compliance preparation with actual operational responsibilities.

Establish a reporting schedule that supports future customer reviews, assign control owners, and maintain security records. Rather than simply helping respond to the current request, a successful SOC 2 project should leave your business better prepared for the next enterprise opportunity.

Keeping the evidence you collect organized from the start also makes the next audit cycle less of a scramble. Reviewing responsibilities and schedules at regular intervals helps controls keep operating between audits.

Recent Post

Top Category

Scroll to Top